Deathball Ownage Map Pack?

Look for maps, show your maps...

Moderators: Jay2k1, DavidM, The_One

Locked
User avatar
Surge
Banned
Posts: 920
Joined: 09-03-2003 00:34

Post by Surge »

the goals feel bigger on cow temple... too wide or something.

And the pitch is too small for the pbox size so it feels a but clastrophobic to play constantly, and generally gets kinda spammy...

the side ledges should be raised and become useless also... all people use them for is cherry picking.
User avatar
jet2lag
Senior Member
Posts: 113
Joined: 09-03-2003 09:06
Contact:

Post by jet2lag »

goals are a bit bigger - thought it is ok because of the higher goal position
the sides have to be redone i agree.

but for all others - plz write the suggestions in the map depot - this is the mappack thread :D
User avatar
Chrisfu
Posts: 387
Joined: 10-03-2003 00:51

Post by Chrisfu »

YoYo789 wrote: And why?


Because who in the right mind would have enough experiance on any of the said maps, enough to be able to play a DBL match competently? People have/had enough trouble playing on maps such as Curve, Chill and Sediment as it is.

The DBL pool of maps should be kept small so that everyone has at least some clan experiance playing on all the maps.
User avatar
jet2lag
Senior Member
Posts: 113
Joined: 09-03-2003 09:06
Contact:

Post by jet2lag »

hm don't think that you only need maps where you can play games like clanmatches.

some fun levels are good for ffa.
i know that most of you allways complain about ffa, but hey - see the server list - ppl play :P

having fun in a ffa game depends on many things - a "not-for-real-matches-map" wouldn't make diffrences
Locked