Notpron Forums

Can there be duplicate numbers?

Good question, one that I believe should be answered for clarity. Yes

amh wrote:I'm not a mod but you can PM me. Tell me what you have and we'll see if you are on the right track.

I say lies! But on the other hand, just got to this level. I like these kinds of puzzles! You really have to go with EVERY possible combination. But I do have one question, are how to numbers organized in the text important, or can I mix them around?

For example, let's say **:

Can it be <snip ... spoilery> ?

edit: Done. Did it with a friend.

Pm me and I'll answer that

I've been trying this level for some half-hour, I guess, with other two friends, and we're all having different ideas and theories of how to find the 41 numbers, is there any Mod I can contact to check if my idea is correct or wrong?

<edit> or better, if I'm in the right path or not?
<edi2t> nevermind, got it... jesus, this is what I call, use "anything" you remember of...

Back after a little hiatus and stuck on this now...this is just going to be one of those tedious, try everything ones isn't it??? Like many people, things I've tried either give me too many or not enough. *sigh* Just have to keep at it!

It could be called tedious, but it is logical and fun too!

I'm stuck with 40! Can I PM you for some help?

I took very long to pass this level, but after I finished I felt it was totally fair. My appreciation to David increased a lot after that, he is an awesome riddle designer. I must've stared for dozens of hours at those numbers and yet, the answer was right in front of me, the whole time. I was just not seeing them at the right way haha. When I finally got it, it was a very memorable moment of my life. Keep trying!

smallwanderer wrote:I'm stuck with 40! Can I PM you for some help?

Sure

I've got 41 numbers, 2 of which are somewhat of a stretch- is there anyone I can check these with? Thanks in advance!

Sure PM me.

i think i need some clarification. So all of the numbers will be seen visually within the picture? Or will some numbers deal with the properties of the picture such as image dimensions, file size, etc?

Only those you can see in the image, no manipulation or metatdata

amh wrote:Only those you can see in the image, no manipulation or metatdata

can i pm you? i believe i am on the right track, however i am still about 4 numbers short