The flexible thing is nicer, if we're on the same page
I Think Vol. 2
Moderators: Jay2k1, DavidM, The_One
It's a nice strat in theory, but I don't see the advantage in rotating unless someone died and you wanted to get another person across the field quickly. Why rotate if it's so easy to boost people to wherever you want them to be? In other words, why would you want the best attacker playing d for a while when a designated defender could play d? The concept of boosting back already has the offense playing D, so I don't see why you would need to officially rotate.
The flexible thing is nicer, if we're on the same page
The flexible thing is nicer, if we're on the same page
Boosting back is all well and good and I'm not saying rotation should replace it.
But you all know that boosting back is not always viable if the team members are spread around the pitch or the opposing team are boost blocking.
Flexibility, adaptability and good decision making are needed whenever you play and whatever 'strategy' you use.
Those qualities are not strategies in their own right - more a mentality I'd say.
But you all know that boosting back is not always viable if the team members are spread around the pitch or the opposing team are boost blocking.
Flexibility, adaptability and good decision making are needed whenever you play and whatever 'strategy' you use.
Those qualities are not strategies in their own right - more a mentality I'd say.