who has this midi in their sig?

speedy · Post by **speedy** » 25-11-2003 21:10

if you're happy and you know it clap your hands!

?????

Messy · Post by **Messy** » 25-11-2003 21:51

It's rens, duh. already told u, view source on a page where the song plays and look for .wav .mid or .mp3 duh.

Messy · Post by **Messy** » 25-11-2003 21:52

Look! proof:

Messy wrote: :s It's in rens' signature..

http://www.funlol.com/content/happynunoit.mid

gg source code

make it stop rens =\

speedy · Post by **speedy** » 25-11-2003 22:02

lol :>

-plær- · Post by **-plær-** » 25-11-2003 22:12

and that's not the worst possible abuse of full html in signatures by a long way...

Rens2Sea · Post by **Rens2Sea** » 26-11-2003 00:25

I'm inocent :O

Post by **The_One** » 26-11-2003 02:08

Thank God it doesn't work in Mozilla.

speedy · Post by **speedy** » 26-11-2003 11:20

omg? i was reading this thread then it went to http://davidm.isgay.com/

[GR]Kermit · Post by **[GR]Kermit** » 26-11-2003 13:00

the song ownz!

[1234]Jr · Post by **[1234]Jr** » 26-11-2003 13:50

Options -> Turn of sig

i already have

problem solved, phone soon

-plær- · Post by **-plær-** » 26-11-2003 14:05

speedy wrote: omg? i was reading this thread then it went to http://davidm.isgay.com/

That was an example of the abuse I was talking about.
My sig *did* that (removed now) with a timeout redirect.
That was a harmless example. I could have also quite easily spawned a million goatse popunder-windows, or done some vicious things with ActiveX, for those who are silly enough to still be using IE.

This is why gs.net desparately need to lock down their sig rules. They have a perfectly valid vB code, which would allow everything that you need for a "normal" sig, but yet they still allow full html. I don't know if this is ignorance or stupidity. If it is intentional, god help us all...

Maegrim · Post by **Maegrim** » 26-11-2003 14:39

i like iframes

speedy · Post by **speedy** » 26-11-2003 15:53

-plær- · Post by **-plær-** » 26-11-2003 16:03

I'd hardly consider the possibility of running unrestricted code something to laugh about. Perhaps I'll embed Internet Exploder in an iframe. Then we'll see who is "lol"-ing at then end of it...

Post by **The_One** » 26-11-2003 16:26

I'm tempted to crash Internet Explorer with my sig, just so they turn HTML off. =/