delays

Everything about Death Ball.

Moderators: Jay2k1, DavidM, The_One

Sequa
Member
Posts: 90
Joined: 08-06-2003 10:24
Contact:

delays

Post by Sequa »

just a suggestion ;)

You could remove the delays (was 0.6 secs, now its something ~0.5 I think when you can't volley the ball after an enemy shot it) and decreas the volleyradius to half of the size while the ~0.5 secs. Wouldn't be so spammy because you couldn't reach the ball often but you still have a chance to volley-intercept it when the ball flys towards your goal or sth..

What do you think?
User avatar
*DeN*23*
Junior Member
Posts: 27
Joined: 07-07-2003 16:34
Contact:

Post by *DeN*23* »

ITS A GOOD IDEA
cY|riCo
Posts: 287
Joined: 30-07-2003 00:38

Post by cY|riCo »

idd \o/
gemXX
Member
Posts: 32
Joined: 01-05-2003 20:41

Post by gemXX »

u cant have volley delay 0 cos then u just stand next to attacker and volley as soon as he shoots.
cY|riCo
Posts: 287
Joined: 30-07-2003 00:38

Post by cY|riCo »

that says everything :lol:

close thread \o/
User avatar
Catalyst88
Posts: 707
Joined: 18-03-2003 12:02

Post by Catalyst88 »

gemXX wrote: u cant have volley delay 0 cos then u just stand next to attacker and volley as soon as he shoots.


Which is the reason the delays were added in the first place :)
User avatar
klesk
Member
Posts: 65
Joined: 25-03-2003 19:11

Post by klesk »

he said half of the size
beefsack
Posts: 921
Joined: 09-03-2003 22:57
Location: Canberra, Australia
Contact:

Post by beefsack »

deathball died the day volley spam was abolished. it is the dagger in all VO lover's hearts.
User avatar
DavidM
Posts: 6795
Joined: 08-03-2003 20:35
Contact:

Post by DavidM »

this would have a bad spammy effect.
1.9 is a move towards defenders, lowering the latencies would just make it even easier for them.

I think now we are at a point where its impossible to score if the defense makes no mistakes (which was different with broomstick)
hence lowering the latency wouldnt be too wise
User avatar
Onge
Senior Member
Posts: 926
Joined: 17-04-2003 13:18

Post by Onge »

So every goal conceeded is the defence's fault and not down to the skill of an attacker?
User avatar
Catalyst88
Posts: 707
Joined: 18-03-2003 12:02

Post by Catalyst88 »

Yep, every single goal... I'm not really a good attacker, jut really lucky because the defenders can't defend :) (But shh... don't tell anyone)
Fallen
Banned
Posts: 472
Joined: 19-03-2003 18:27

Post by Fallen »

DavidM wrote: this would have a bad spammy effect.
1.9 is a move towards defenders, lowering the latencies would just make it even easier for them.

I think now we are at a point where its impossible to score if the defense makes no mistakes (which was different with broomstick)
hence lowering the latency wouldnt be too wise
If this mod seems to be pushing more to the defensive side, why not help the attackers out. It seems that if you can volley better than the defender beside you, you should score re-direction.

Why not make the shot power 10% stronger.
gemXX
Member
Posts: 32
Joined: 01-05-2003 20:41

Post by gemXX »

Sycophant wrote: So every goal conceeded is the defence's fault and not down to the skill of an attacker?

An attackers skill causes defence to make mistakes. How many defensive mistakes do you generally make against noobs?
Ars3h
Banned
Posts: 483
Joined: 30-09-2003 21:29

Post by Ars3h »

i agree catalyst your shit
User avatar
Catalyst88
Posts: 707
Joined: 18-03-2003 12:02

Post by Catalyst88 »

Ars3h wrote: i agree catalyst your shit

Glad someone does :p
Locked