Interview

Post by **DavidM** » 19-11-2007 12:33

Posting it here as long as the page is down:

http://ut3hound.com/2007/11/19/no-plans ... 3/#more-24

Post by **The_One** » 19-11-2007 23:32

No killing huh? You might need to add netting around the side of all the maps if people are going to start being kicked around (by the sound of it).

fro · Post by **fro** » 20-11-2007 21:39

the clues in the name.

also, ut2004 does have everything that db needs. apart from players.

Post by **The_One** » 21-11-2007 09:56

It will definitely lose a certain visceral charm but, hey, David's got to have something to do. x)

Instigator · Post by **Instigator** » 27-11-2007 22:00

Do you have a eta on a stand alone version? Are you months off or are we talking years?

aimbot · Post by **aimbot** » 28-11-2007 17:15

fro wrote: also, ut2004 does have everything that db needs. apart from players.

Even if you only ported DB to UT3 for the new engine alone, I bet it would bring a lot of players back to the mod and also attract a new crowd.

People always want new, shiny stuff ... can't blame them.

No idea, how much effort this would take, but it might be worth it.

Post by **DavidM** » 29-11-2007 16:20

I don't wanna put a lot of effort in running with full speed into a dead end.

aimbot · Post by **aimbot** » 29-11-2007 17:20

I could be just the dead end sign that scares you.

Post by **DavidM** » 01-12-2007 11:16

Dead end signs don't lie.
Except I take a bulldozer into the dead end and create a new road.
Stupid metaphers make it look like a good idea that could work. Better ignore them

Onge · Post by **Onge** » 05-12-2007 00:54

fro wrote: the clues in the name.

also, ut2004 does have everything that db needs. apart from players.