Surge, I think you raise some good points but your argument is fundamentally flawed because I dont think a team could really play the way you describe and be successful. I think they could put up a good fight against a team with higher quality strikers, but they'd be fighting a losing battle.
The majority of successful teams keep the ball in the enemy half as much as possible by using the goal hanger tactic, which is: One attacker stays upfield and does 3 important things:
1: Prevents opposition boosting upfield
2: Receives long passes in order to make an opportunistic goal if free to do so
3: Receives long passes in order to hold up the ball while teammates boost forward.
Knowing that the ball is relatively safe upfield, a good defense will not ritually kill all attackers in their pen box since its just helping the enemy defense. In fact the last defender should try to prevent them boosting back if possible.
The midfield player is then boosted up asap to help with the attack which needs to be quick. Unless the counter attack is fast, the initiative is lost.
Thats it really. I've seen this form of play used by many teams. It works. It leads to fast, open play and there's nothing wrong with it. Generally, the best boosting/passing/shooting side wins. Of course
Btw, you really have to learn to be more concise. (!)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/924b6/924b63674789b3579e4083dd95e7bd052dc99a5b" alt="roll eyes (sarcastic) :rolleyes:"