T3rm1n4T0r wrote:
This is a joke, isn't it? Everyone knows that you are the most ignorant and arrogant person here. So don't tell other people to behave different.
His opinion is hardly ignorant. VO was part of the game for a long time and on the pubs it became something crude that I would have to agree ran against what Deathball was supposed to be about - teamwork, disciplined position play, passing..
VO was all about mobbing and hogging the ball. It was like a mosh pit with people not caring what whas going on and hitting at random until someone manages a breakaway self-set for an easy score. Noone was playing defense most of the time! Everyone just chased the ball like spastic puppies. That is NOT what Deathball is supposed to be. And when I polled various VO enthusiasts about the appeal of this styple of play, the most common answer: fast action.
So we have David's vision of Deathball - an elegant game of ball control. And then there's the high energy VO folks that just want to hit the ball a lot and be 'in the game' vs playing as slow reg match. Can both be happy?
As far as compromise goes, Deathball will continue to be Deathball. The conflict here isn't in the game itself, it's in what kind of game people want. I think removing VO is a little extreme but watching it turn matches into something that makes Deathball look like less of a sport over the years might be a good thing. Personally, I would have opted to keep the option since I like a lot of in-the-box choices without having to add muts and sub-mods.
So Term, if you're for or against the changes, just say your peace and support your logic with reasons, not name-calling. Ok?