@ David: LEARN TO USE UMODS

Jinxed · Post by **Jinxed** » 30-06-2003 12:42

I agree that you should be using the umod method. I mean seriously 83 MB. Come on...

Maegrim · Post by **Maegrim** » 30-06-2003 13:15

deathball17.mpeg? no more complaining about bugs, they'll just watch the game

eNoS|S · Post by **eNoS|S** » 30-06-2003 13:16

Maegrim wrote: deathball17.mpeg? no more complaining about bugs, they'll just watch the game

loooooooooooooool:lol:

fro · Post by **fro** » 30-06-2003 13:19

doesnt bother me @ around 2MB a sec

the whole download was grabbed and burnt onto a cd in under 5 mins. i love fast connections

DaJero · Post by **DaJero** » 01-07-2003 07:35

Well in another thread I read a post from someone who tried to umod it and rar it with maximum compression...... 87(eightyseven) Megabytes!

InSaNe · Post by **InSaNe** » 01-07-2003 08:28

Uh Surge is the bggest whiner of NA even DB lol, get your most whiny man and let's see who can whine most

Robotojon · Post by **Robotojon** » 01-07-2003 12:12

yeah 2coolfu, that doesnt suprise me, as tbh, you cant generally compress compressed files and get a smaller file. Generally, it reaches a point where the new file will be bigger from extra compression tables. Other wise, well, we could just zip then rar then zip, etc, till its so small it takes 2 secs on 56k modem $\o/$ Viv la breaking the laws of physics $\o/$

MeSSiaH{FCU} · Post by **MeSSiaH{FCU}** » 01-07-2003 13:12

Originally posted by Robotojon
yeah 2coolfu

pfff be nice :p

DaJero · Post by **DaJero** » 01-07-2003 18:02

Robotojon wrote: yeah 2cool4-u, that doesnt suprise me, as tbh, you cant generally compress compressed files and get a smaller file. Generally, it reaches a point where the new file will be bigger from extra compression tables. Other wise, well, we could just zip then rar then zip, etc, till its so small it takes 2 secs on 56k modem $\o/$ Viv la breaking the laws of physics $\o/$

Nope, that's true but I didn't know how well the installation program compresses the files.

Chick-kun · Post by **Chick-kun** » 02-07-2003 06:21

tarballs $\o/$ 0_o tar.gz ;p

nah seriously david, you gotta use directory structure in your zips ;p

nameless · Post by **nameless** » 02-07-2003 10:02

umod can t be used on linux/unix.

Post by **DavidM** » 02-07-2003 10:04

chick, i didn't make the zip....that's bazzi's
and afaik he was shouting at me for not having dirs in it, so i added some in 1.6 and 1.5.....
/me slaps bazzi for not having them in 1.7 if this is true

OxyMoron · Post by **OxyMoron** » 02-07-2003 10:41

If you're in charge take it on the chin, dont blame other team members, thats just bad management...if you want to take the glory then you should check things yourself, if you cant be bothered to check then it's actually your fault.

BTW, umod packaging isn't exactly a challenge.