Penalty Kick

SupaHonn · Post by **SupaHonn** » 20-06-2003 16:58

Hi

What about an other ending method... penalty kicks... Like in hockey. One player starts at midpoint and one keeper. when keeper gets ball, it's shot outside or even goal then next one... Till 5 or a team messed up so many that it's impossible to win...

METAFrank · Post by **METAFrank** » 20-06-2003 17:00

already said.

Tonnberry · Post by **Tonnberry** » 20-06-2003 17:01

Will be added in a future version

SupaHonn · Post by **SupaHonn** » 20-06-2003 17:59

Ahh naise and sry 4 multi posting...

Post by **DavidM** » 20-06-2003 18:35

10th thread about that, thanks

InSaNe · Post by **InSaNe** » 22-06-2003 21:48

Larry_Bird · Post by **Larry_Bird** » 22-06-2003 22:47

The 10 thread about it, its because we want it in

fs|Pele · Post by **fs|Pele** » 23-06-2003 09:14

penalty kick is cool $\o/$ it pwnes yall k?

Alars · Post by **Alars** » 25-06-2003 13:14

so is that how it'll work? ....cos i find that most of the time the shot will be a goal if its 1v1...

why not have the shooter stand a certain number of metres/unreal units away form the goal, unable to move and shoot on the spot from there?

that would make it slightly easier for the keeper that way....

Alars

MeSSiaH{FCU} · Post by **MeSSiaH{FCU}** » 26-06-2003 12:25

^
||
||
dude that's what penalty kicks is all about neway O_o (the standing still part

)

BloodyLoony · Post by **BloodyLoony** » 26-06-2003 14:54

This would suck...

Post by **The_One** » 26-06-2003 15:45

thanks for that insiteful comment, it's really appreciated.

TEZC_Robban · Post by **TEZC_Robban** » 26-06-2003 19:33

fro · Post by **fro** » 27-06-2003 14:16

its true tho... it would suck.

i think golden goal is a better solution to the problem, as to get the winning goal, it takes a team effort, not just the overly abundant ego strikers.

Post by **The_One** » 27-06-2003 14:41

how can you know it will suck?
are you a soothsayer?