'We want Panda'

-Camel- · Post by **-Camel-** » 21-05-2003 21:04

K, i've lost count, its sumthin like panda 15 davidm 1 or sumthin, couldn't really care. U know it would make it easier 4 me if u just posted 'Panda' or 'DavidM'.

Maegrim · Post by **Maegrim** » 21-05-2003 21:06

PandaM

gutterflower · Post by **gutterflower** » 21-05-2003 21:09

cant panda stick up for himself once in a while, is this all you ever do, run around making sure panda isnt called fat and ugly or something.

panda got kicked, boo fucking hoo, time to move on

TEZC_Robban · Post by **TEZC_Robban** » 21-05-2003 21:13

... O_o
Panda is a nice guy, you!

gutterflower · Post by **gutterflower** » 21-05-2003 21:16

didnt say he wasnt, but so what if david M does something similar to match of the day on his site, its his site, and if panda is working on his site he should abide by david M's rules, if he doesnt hes going to be kicked, simple. Doesnt mean MOTD has to go with him.

I work at M$

i employ panda

panda comes up with M$ word

panda decides to put pr0n in m$ word

i sack panda

Do i have to give up word?

just because you all lub panda, and all hate david, doesnt make panda right..

oh and when you say "we want panda", speak for yourself.. all he does is whine

L33FY · Post by **L33FY** » 21-05-2003 22:17

gutterflower wrote: deathball academy was already nicked off of me by chrisfu apparently...heh

Heh... No it wasnt. Fraid so. Truth hurts

Chrisfu · Post by **Chrisfu** » 21-05-2003 22:59

gutterflower wrote: deathball academy was already nicked off of me by chrisfu apparently...heh

I'm afraid I didn't. I'm not patronising enough to claim to be "schooling" them, as you did with your Deathball School idea. We're giving them a the platform and the resources where a bunch of inexperianced players can play in a regular team, against good opposition. They get all their questions answered as best they can. They run the show.

If you still think that mean Chrisfu stole your idea, answer me this: what did you ever do about it? No one that is helping with the DBA is claiming credit for anything (as far as I'm aware), so I'm damned if you're going to.

BlackFlame · Post by **BlackFlame** » 21-05-2003 23:05

right, i think we are losing the point of this thread, this is about saving panda and his idea, i think that davidM should allow panda back on the site with a few new rules(that they alone should discuss) like less strict deadline....

and in answer to Disturbed (yellow rain falls on the ageing elephant surronded by dying geese)

Chrisfu · Post by **Chrisfu** » 21-05-2003 23:13

Personally, I think DavidM should choose someone to share the leadership of the community with. NOT someone from Team Vortex, as a "Yes" man would solve nothing. Things need to be made more democratic.

I am of course pissing in the wind, as this will never, ever happen.

BlackFlame · Post by **BlackFlame** » 21-05-2003 23:18

youcouldpickme as i would be biast towards no one.... come on pick me

BloodyLoony · Post by **BloodyLoony** » 21-05-2003 23:22

What's the fuzz?
I mean either the whole story isn't being told or you guys are seing problems that aren't there.

The way I see it, Panda and DavidM had disagreements and wouldn't wanna be part of the same project. Panda leaves and does the same thing on his own. DavidM wants a guy to do it officially - on the DBL page, which I can understand. Just as well as I can understand that Panda wanna make MOTD on his own when he can't agree with DavidM.

Do what you wanna do and that's it!
*Stop whining (Arnold-wise)*

Chrisfu · Post by **Chrisfu** » 21-05-2003 23:47

I think Panda and DavidM should also have a good old scrap. No pulling hair, mind.

Kyllian · Post by **Kyllian** » 22-05-2003 07:08

If Panda were to create his own MOTD site, I'd probably end up visiting it more often than these forums and the DBL

Panda · Post by **Panda** » 22-05-2003 18:46

A bit of news for ya, I've got a couple of options of where to move MOTD to so I'm just deciding which to choose now, expect more from the MOTD team soon

MeSSiaH{FCU} · Post by **MeSSiaH{FCU}** » 22-05-2003 19:27

What's the problem with having two MOTD-ish projects? Nothing's wrong with trying to be the best one..could only be good for us, it would probably be DavidM's MOTD with the advantage tho, coz of the 'official' coverage n stuff.
I think this is all just ripped out of context.

And isnt it logical u cant just post internal stuff in the public? or at least host it urself