<3 Kerry

Dirt · Post by **Dirt** » 03-11-2004 21:21

The purpose of the war was exactly what it is, war on terrorism. Since you don't know shit I will tell you a little something they don't teach you in euro school. There are more terrorist organizations in or funded by Iraq than any other country. Hence why we are over there. The reason for capturing Sadam was the simple fact that he was the main evil in the country and encouraged terrorism and funded terrorism.

Post by **The_One** » 03-11-2004 21:22

Why so few ground troops if the idea is to wipe out terrorist cells? They're kinda hard to spot from the air.

Dirt · Post by **Dirt** » 03-11-2004 21:25

Air strikes were on anything to do with military so that our ground troops could march in. There are thousands of ground troops over there right now. No idea what your talkin about.

Capital_G · Post by **Capital_G** » 03-11-2004 21:26

Cenotaph wrote: Duh, I R Cpt.Obvious?

http://captain-obvious.com/
Finding that banner there is almost scary oO
True though.

Cenotaph · Post by **Cenotaph** » 03-11-2004 21:28

Dirt wrote: The purpose of the war was exactly what it is, war on terrorism. Since you don't know shit I will tell you a little something they don't teach you in euro school. There are more terrorist organizations in or funded by Iraq than any other country. Hence why we are over there. The reason for capturing Sadam was the simple fact that he was the main evil in the country and encouraged terrorism and funded terrorism.

And i'll tell other thing you don't know. The country that has more terrorist factions in the world is the... USA.
They are also the country with more weapons of mass destruction.

But since now you guys invaded Iraq, without the UN aproval. Just imagine if China thinks: Fuck it, let's make a war on US just for no reason. What then? US can't blame China cause they done the very same thing to others, and billions would probably be killed around the world. Who cares? War is a game to you...

Post by **The_One** » 03-11-2004 21:33

Dirt wrote: Air strikes were on anything to do with military so that our ground troops could march in. There are thousands of ground troops over there right now. No idea what your talkin about.

The cities are over run with criminality, it's a breeding ground for terrorists. There are far too few ground troops in Iraq to prevent this.

Fooman · Post by **Fooman** » 03-11-2004 21:33

There's a difference between good and evil, and terrorists sure aren't good.

Post by **The_One** » 03-11-2004 21:36

Cenotaph wrote: But since now you guys invaded Iraq, without the UN aproval. Just imagine if China thinks: Fuck it, let's make a war on US just for no reason. What then? US can't blame China cause they done the very same thing to others, and billions would probably be killed around the world. Who cares? War is a game to you...

That's just silly.

Twigstir · Post by **Twigstir** » 03-11-2004 21:40

The american public has always been pussies when it comes to war unless attacked. Bush had to lie to convince the american public to go.

The UN is corrupted. Money talks and the world wouldn't deal with iraq as it should. All politics and greed.

Too bad politics and greed rule the world. When the world learns to shove politic and greed and due the right things to stop evil, then the world will be a much better place.

Rino · Post by **Rino** » 03-11-2004 22:02

an_old_man wrote: I, when its clear that the media is liberal and biased.you just dont realize it.

BUAHAHAHHAHA

Go to tell this to the photographer fired becouse she showed the pictures of american soldier's coffins...

And in italy , the 90& of media are owned by our president...

Omg u really believe what u saying:lol:

Onge · Post by **Onge** » 03-11-2004 22:17

Rino wrote: Omg u really believe what u saying:lol:

Not

at all. It's quite alarming.

I think it is interesting how it was America's "duty" to invade Iraq because Sadam was a threat to world peace and a target in the appallingly named "War on Terror", yet they couldn't give a fuck about Korea, Zimbabwe and the other host of nations who pose a serious threat to world peace or who reign by tyranic regimes.

Cenotaph · Post by **Cenotaph** » 03-11-2004 22:22

Politics is just too corrupted these days, its a shame!

Its all about some1 interests and power.

And the ppl get caught in the middle and serve as puppets to their meanings.

Post by **The_One** » 03-11-2004 22:25

I wouldn't say Zimbabwe poses a serious threat to world peace, just to its own people. It really needs to be sorted out though. Why our cricket team is going there God only knows.

Onge · Post by **Onge** » 03-11-2004 22:43

The_One wrote: I wouldn't say Zimbabwe poses a serious threat to world peace, just to its own people. It really needs to be sorted out though. Why our cricket team is going there God only knows.

Food for thought. And our cricket team should boycott them...Although I don't actually give a shit about that non-sport...

Post by **The_One** » 03-11-2004 23:02

I'd say that Zimbabwe's prosecution of white farmers and the subsequent drop of food production would be a bigger threat to Southern Africa. I haven't followed the situation recently but I assume agricultural output is still very low?

Sadly the western world seems to have washed its hands of Africa somewhat and I doubt any unrest there would spill onto over continents (but what do I know).

Agreed about the "non-sport". ^^