Shaken altfire?

Post by **DavidM** » 18-04-2004 12:43

shake time can be increased onge.
i hate it too what you described.
all the attacker scum here wont understand us :<

Sixty · Post by **Sixty** » 18-04-2004 13:15

I do, but if you just time your tackle right.....no problem right?

Goffus · Post by **Goffus** » 18-04-2004 13:39

Or what about If you have no one locked on, you couldnt be able to shot, clear or pass the ball off with alt fire since its like an 1/3 charged primary fire shot without any chance to be shaken. And leave the regular pass (lock + altfire) the way they are atm.

Just an idea

Post by **DavidM** » 18-04-2004 13:41

sounds good to me

Achilles · Post by **Achilles** » 18-04-2004 14:06

gd idea since even the old sweeps and keeps[like me] are becoming attackers since its just no fun how hard its getting to do it.

[GR]Kermit · Post by **[GR]Kermit** » 18-04-2004 14:09

I think it's not a good idea.
Atm the thing is that as a defender you have you jump simular as the offender to pretend a rmb pass. On that way you can block the passes into the middle but with shake you wouldn't be able to pass back or something like that

Wibble · Post by **Wibble** » 18-04-2004 14:12

I quite like the way things are now tbh. If an attacker gets close enough to get off a pass shot, then the defence is crap anyway!

It seems pretty clear that David has decided to do something though....

[V3]Cajubski · Post by **[V3]Cajubski** » 18-04-2004 15:21

dont fix what isnt broken..no alt-fire shake kthx

Post by **The_One** » 18-04-2004 16:17

I think this is the worst idea you've ever had David.

Requiem`` · Post by **Requiem``** » 18-04-2004 16:20

well, tbh, and regarding 2.0 beta, i guess there's allready enough shakes in db now

Look dbl1, it's only a shakes party x_X i'm not sure adding some would be good

priior · Post by **priior** » 18-04-2004 16:31

i think goffus has the rigth idea.

right mouse button is meant as a pass.. not a shot.. if you want to use it as a pass.. it should be subjected to the same conditions.

so.. if you have a lock.. no shake.. if u have no lock.. same shake as lmb. the logic is solid imo.

as for longer shake time.. i would totally like that too.. but i also realize i am totally biased as a sweeper.. and it would make a huge shift in balance. not sure is a good idea to implement it.

only thing i can think of onthat issue.. is compensate the shake time enough to match the new overcharge time.

BurntLeaf · Post by **BurntLeaf** » 18-04-2004 17:07

omfg dont touch shake

its too easy to defend already @ achill ... wtf

Post by **DavidM** » 18-04-2004 17:16

dont state your opinion more than once, except you have something useful to say.
i agree with priior.

NightBoY · Post by **NightBoY** » 18-04-2004 17:21

bad idea

Armagon · Post by **Armagon** » 18-04-2004 19:31

priior wrote: i think goffus has the rigth idea.

right mouse button is meant as a pass.. not a shot.. if you want to use it as a pass.. it should be subjected to the same conditions.

so.. if you have a lock.. no shake.. if u have no lock.. same shake as lmb. the logic is solid imo.

I like that idea a lot. :p